Hot off the press: a new role for histone modifications in genomic imprinting
Imprinted genes are expressed from either the paternal or maternal allele. Reporting in Nature Communications, scientists led by Martin Leeb have now discovered 71 previously unrecognized imprinted genes in preimplantation blastocysts. The study found that imprinting created by differential histone marks plays a more prominent role in the preimplantation blastocyst than canonical DNA methylation mechanisms.
We all inherit traits from our parents, but not only as one set of genes from our father and one from our mother. Epigenetic marks change the way our genes work – without altering the DNA sequence. For most genes, both copies of the gene are active, but a minority of genes is exclusively expressed from either the maternal or paternal allele. The epigenetic mechanism first attributed to this phenomenon, termed genomic imprinting, was DNA methylation. Methylation occurs primarily on cytosine, one of the four bases that together make up our genetic code, and typically leads to the repression of transcription. However, a second mechanism implicated in imprinting relies on histone modifications. Here, it is the methylation of histone proteins that changes the transcriptional activity of genes. “Historically, DNA methylation has been the subject of most imprinting studies, but in recent years it has been reported that trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 is an important imprinting mark”, explains co-first author Laura Santini. Hundreds of imprinted genes have been identified and defects in imprinting are implicated in several developmental disorders.
Top left: allele-specific RNA-Seq performed on pre-implantation blastocysts from reciprocal mice hybrids to identify parent-of-origin specific gene expression; top right: genome-wide methylation analysis performed on uniparental haploid blastocysts to identify DNA methylation regions that are differentially methylated between the maternal and paternal genomes; bottom: H3K27me3-dependent imprinting has a major impact at the pre-implantation blastocyst stage, especially for the “transient” novel imprinted genes in contrast to the more prominent role for DNA methylation-dependent imprinting at later developmental stages for canonical imprinted genes. (c) Laura Santini, Maki Asami, Martin Leeb
In cooperation with Florian Halbritter from the St. Anna Children’s Cancer Research Institute and Tony Perry from the University of Bath, the scientists have now identified 71 novel imprinted genes and profiled their methylation status. “We realized that the majority of the novel genes with uniparental expression in preimplantation blastocyst were not residing in close proximity to methylation marks, implying that DNA methylation was not the major driver of imprinting at this developmental stage”, says Laura Santini. The team found out that also some of the genes historically associated with DNA methylation are actually regulated by H3K27 trimethylation specifically in blastocysts. This suggests that histone modifications play a more significant role in early development than previously thought.
The fundamental reasons for imprinting mechanisms are still, largely, a mystery, and the precise mechanisms involved in the regulation of imprinted genes are not fully understood. H3K27 trimethylation is a reversible modification, and many of the imprinted genes lose their H3K27 marks during development. DNA methylation on the other hand is a more stable mark, but the levels in pre-implantation blastocysts are low. “It seems that histone modification may serve as a backup system to ensure that imprinting is maintained during early development before DNA methylation takes over as the primary imprinting mechanism”, concludes group leader Martin Leeb.
Publication:
Genomic imprinting in mouse blastocysts is predominantly associated with H3K27me3
Laura Santini1, Florian Halbritter, Fabian Titz-Teixeira, Toru Suzuki , Maki Asami, Xiaoyan Ma,
Julia Ramesmayer1, Andreas Lackner , Nick Warr, Florian Pauler, Simon Hippenmeyer , Ernest Laue,
Matthias Farlik, Christoph Bock, Andreas Beyer, Anthony C. F. Perry & Martin Leeb
Corresponding Authors: Anthony C. F. Perry & Martin Leeb
These authors contributed equally: Laura Santini, Florian Halbritter
Nature Communications 2021, June 21. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23510-4
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23510-4